Table of Contents
In today’s digital age, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in creative processes is becoming increasingly prevalent. AI is often used to generate and edit art, and blog articles, but it’s crucial to understand that while AI assists in these tasks, the thoughts and ideas behind the work remain entirely original and human-driven.
For those who are neurodivergent, maintaining attention for extended periods can be challenging. AI provides a valuable tool to help sustain focus and productivity, making it easier to transform ideas into tangible creations. This support allows for continuous work on new concepts without the struggle of maintaining prolonged attention.
The Benefits of AI in Creative Processes
AI acts as a facilitator, enabling the efficient extraction and organization of creative thoughts. It serves as a significant time-saver, providing a platform to develop ideas swiftly and move forward with new projects. However, it’s important to recognize that AI has its limitations, particularly in artistic realms where human touch and creativity are irreplaceable. There are times when AI reaches its creative limits, and human intervention becomes essential to ensure the quality and authenticity of the work.
AI as a Tool, Not a Replacement
AI is not a replacement for human creativity. The use of AI is a strategic choice to enhance efficiency and productivity, not a shortcut to bypass thoughtful creation. Every piece of work produced with AI assistance undergoes meticulous human review and refinement to ensure it aligns with the original vision and standards.
Thoughtful Creation with AI Assistance
The commitment to thoughtful creation remains unwavering. While AI provides valuable support, the core of the creative process is human-centric. This approach ensures that every piece of work reflects genuine effort and originality. By harnessing the strengths of AI without compromising the integrity of human creativity, a harmonious blend of technology and artistry is achieved.
Conclusion
Incorporating AI into creative processes offers numerous benefits, especially for neurodivergent individuals. AI helps maintain focus and productivity, allowing for the seamless transition of ideas into reality. However, it’s essential to remember that AI is a tool to enhance human creativity, not replace it. Every creation involves careful thought and human touch, ensuring authenticity and originality in every piece of work.
Afternote: The Hidden Costs of AI’s Resource Demand Oct/2025
As AI becomes more integrated into creative and professional work, it’s also important to note the resources that power it. Running large AI models requires significant electricity and water for data centers, which has led to rising attention on sustainability.
AI’s Growing Resource Footprint
The International Energy Agency (IEA) projects that electricity demand from data centers — heavily driven by AI workloads — will more than double by 2030. AI is already estimated to account for 5–15 % of current data center power use, with projections that this share could rise to 35–50 % by 2030.
AI’s expansion is also driving more water usage (for cooling) and increased demand on hardware manufacturing/supply chains.
Video & Image AI Tend to Be the Most Intensive
Step-by-step processing eats energy: Video AI doesn’t just “spit out” a clip. It works in loops, cleaning up a noisy guess frame by frame until a smooth video appears. Each of those clean-up steps takes power, and there can be hundreds of them.
Higher quality = way more cost: Making videos bigger or clearer isn’t just a little extra work — it grows fast. A jump from low quality (240p) to standard HD (720p) can use around 10 times more energy. Making the video longer adds even more on top of that.
Much heavier than text or photos: Even a tiny, 2-second AI video can use about six times more energy than a full AI chat response. Compared to a simple internet search, one 3-second video can burn 15,000 times more energy. AI video tools are some of the most resource-hungry kinds of AI. Text and images already take a lot of computing power, but generating moving pictures ramps the demand up dramatically.
Key Players & Cases Under Scrutiny
xAI / Colossus (Memphis)
xAI (Elon Musk’s AI company) is building a supercomputer called Colossus near Memphis, Tennessee. It has requested over 100 megawatts of power—enough to power ~100,000 homes.
Concerns raised:
The local power grid is already under stress; approving such a large load increases risks of blackouts or forced curtailments.
The project has reportedly set up dozens of gas turbines nearby to generate power, raising air quality and emissions concerns.
Local residents say they weren’t adequately informed or consulted, and are suffering air pollution and quality‐of‐life issues.
Other Big Tech
Many of the largest AI and cloud infrastructure players are under pressure and criticism for how they report or manage their resource use.
Indirect emissions rising fast: A UN / ITU report found that indirect emissions (i.e., electricity, heating, cooling) for Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), and Meta rose ~150% over 2020–2023, largely driven by energy demands of data centers supporting AI.
Green claims under challenge: In 2025, state attorneys general in Wyoming, Montana, and several other U.S. states accused Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft of “greenwashing” – misleading claims about how much clean energy they actually use. They argue that buying Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) does not mean the companies’ operations are truly powered by renewables.
Non-disclosure & opacity: Many AI companies decline to disclose exact energy use per query or water usage. Analysts and environmental groups say that lack of transparency enables exaggeration of efficiency or “net-zero” claims.
Pushing AI features aggressively: Some companies embed or default AI features in their everyday software (e.g. office suites, document tools, chat systems) whether users want them or not. This “force-feeding” of AI encourages higher usage—and thus higher energy demand—even among users who might not need those features.
Why These Practices Are Problematic
Disproportionate burden on communities
When a data-center or AI facility puts pressure on local electrical systems, it’s often the surrounding neighborhoods or towns that bear the suffering – brownouts, increased rates, pollution, infrastructure strain.
Accountability & transparency
If companies don’t publish real data about energy use, water use, or carbon, it’s very hard to hold them to account or compare them. Without independent verification, claims of being “green AI” or “powered by renewables” may just be marketing. Critics assert that many do precisely that.
Resource inequity
Large, wealthy firms can afford to build in places with cheap land, favorable energy deals, or powerful influence over local governments. Smaller users, or regions without such leverage, don’t get equal say.
Rampant scaling pressure
Embedding AI features everywhere (in apps, services, workflows) can create pressure to use AI even when it’s not needed-faster, more queries, more resource use. That becomes a feedback loop driving further infrastructure demand.
Grid instability and spikes
Some AI tasks (e.g. large model training) cause sudden surges in energy demand. Unlike typical steady industrial loads, these spikes can destabilize grids. Hitachi Energy has warned that AI data centers can surge 10× usage in seconds, posing risks to grid stability.
Analysts and energy experts are warning that AI demand could contribute to global energy supply shortages if growth outpaces new generation capacity. If AI growth continues unchecked, regional and even global supply crunches are possible. The solution isn’t to halt AI, but to pair its expansion with aggressive clean energy build-out, smarter grid management, and efficiency improvements. Without that, fossil fuel reliance may extend, worsening climate impacts.
Stay Up to Date:
16 Reads this week |
